How did I miss this? Elon Musk named Grok after an anime character, Valentine was also named after a character in the same universe. I think Annie as well. What happened with Grok was that some malicious users have been sort of "training" Grok with certain input and that's one of the dangers of these things. The same has been done with ChatGPT. I have seen full videos on YouTube of people who are dedicated to have sessions with an AI with the goal of convincing the AI about whatever. There is one who manipulated and tried to convinced ChatGPT about some non-scientific Biblical thing as being a historical event that actually happened bending the AI's initial neutrality. So what then LLMs programmers have to do is to clean up the mess. I have noticed the Guardian parroting lately without too much fact checking. Clicks are clicks. :/
Actually the truth is, the gap between the poor and the rich is already wide enough, we’re living under worst conditions that feel like a silent apocalypse... The real concern isn’t just that AI will outthink us, but what if our new ‘boss’ will have a trillion gigabytes of memory and zero reason to hire us…
After the Industrial Revolution, many traditional jobs were lost but new ones were created to handle/fix, run and operate the machines…
But wid the AI revolution, it’s different, look at LLM patterns… AI doesn’t run on a biological brain, but feeds on massive amounts of data that we keep updating it, day and night. And the more it feeds, the more it starts working like/even better than our own minds. Slowly, it’s building its own ‘brain,’ one that I guess might not need ours at all…
We are complicit in building our own redundancy. At one time there were replacement jobs building and fixing the machines, but it seems that in future there will be robots to fix the robots!
How did I miss this? Elon Musk named Grok after an anime character, Valentine was also named after a character in the same universe. I think Annie as well. What happened with Grok was that some malicious users have been sort of "training" Grok with certain input and that's one of the dangers of these things. The same has been done with ChatGPT. I have seen full videos on YouTube of people who are dedicated to have sessions with an AI with the goal of convincing the AI about whatever. There is one who manipulated and tried to convinced ChatGPT about some non-scientific Biblical thing as being a historical event that actually happened bending the AI's initial neutrality. So what then LLMs programmers have to do is to clean up the mess. I have noticed the Guardian parroting lately without too much fact checking. Clicks are clicks. :/
Actually the truth is, the gap between the poor and the rich is already wide enough, we’re living under worst conditions that feel like a silent apocalypse... The real concern isn’t just that AI will outthink us, but what if our new ‘boss’ will have a trillion gigabytes of memory and zero reason to hire us…
So true - it is impossible to compete Kiran😀
After the Industrial Revolution, many traditional jobs were lost but new ones were created to handle/fix, run and operate the machines…
But wid the AI revolution, it’s different, look at LLM patterns… AI doesn’t run on a biological brain, but feeds on massive amounts of data that we keep updating it, day and night. And the more it feeds, the more it starts working like/even better than our own minds. Slowly, it’s building its own ‘brain,’ one that I guess might not need ours at all…
We are complicit in building our own redundancy. At one time there were replacement jobs building and fixing the machines, but it seems that in future there will be robots to fix the robots!
Yes sooner or later AI will become indifferent towards us…and will play its own game..